What is the Difference Between RF Microneedling and Microneedling?

What is the Difference Between RF Microneedling and Microneedling?

• October 27, 2025
• Dr Suvro Mondal

Last updated on November 11, 2025

One of the most common questions about advanced skin treatments is the difference between RF microneedling vs microneedling. Both approaches create precise micro-channels on the skin’s surface to encourage natural renewal, but RF microneedling also delivers controlled radiofrequency energy beneath the surface. This extra step changes how the treatment works and the types of concerns it can target.

In this latest blog, we’ll break down what each treatment involves, outline the key differences between them and address common misconceptions. By the end, you’ll have a clearer understanding of how microneedling and RF microneedling compare and when one may be considered over the other.

What is Microneedling?

Microneedling is a treatment that uses a specialised device to create controlled micro-channels across the skin’s surface. These tiny entry points prompt the body’s natural repair response, supporting renewal within the upper layers of the skin. Because the process is focused on the surface, microneedling is often used to improve overall texture, tone and visible irregularities such as enlarged pores.

What is RF Microneedling?

RF microneedling builds on the same principle but combines the creation of micro-channels with the delivery of radiofrequency energy. As the device works across the skin, controlled heat is applied to deeper layers beneath the surface. This dual approach means RF microneedling can address not only surface-level texture but also concerns linked to firmness and mild laxity. For this reason, it is often described as an advanced alternative to traditional microneedling.

RF Microneedling vs Microneedling: Key Differences

Although microneedling and RF microneedling share a common foundation, there are important distinctions in how each treatment works and what they are designed to address. Understanding these differences helps to explain why both remain widely used and how they may be considered for different skin concerns.

Technology

Microneedling relies on creating controlled micro-channels at the skin’s surface to trigger natural renewal. RF microneedling adds a second element by delivering radiofrequency energy through the same process. This combination allows RF microneedling to stimulate the skin both mechanically at the surface and thermally at a deeper level.

Depth of Treatment

Microneedling primarily influences the upper layers of the skin, making it most relevant for surface-level texture and tone. RF microneedling, with its added heat energy, can reach deeper structures beneath the surface. This distinction in depth explains why RF microneedling is often chosen when firmness and mild laxity are also a concern.

Skin Concerns Addressed

Microneedling is generally suited to concerns like uneven texture, visible pores and irregular tone. RF microneedling offers these benefits while also extending to deeper concerns, such as early signs of skin laxity. The ability to target both superficial and deeper issues sets RF microneedling apart as a more versatile option in certain cases.

Treatment Sensation

Both treatments involve the creation of micro-channels, which can feel similar during the session. With RF microneedling, however, patients also notice a gentle warmth as the radiofrequency energy is delivered. This added sensation reflects the treatment’s dual action at both the surface and deeper layers.

Treatment Plans

Multiple sessions are usually recommended for either treatment, but the overall plan can differ. Because RF microneedling stimulates change at greater depths, some people may require fewer sessions compared with traditional microneedling. The exact number of treatments varies depending on individual goals and the skin concerns being addressed.

Which Treatment Might Be Right for You?

Choosing between RF microneedling vs microneedling depends on the concerns being addressed and the depth of treatment needed. Microneedling may be more suitable for surface-level texture, while RF microneedling can be considered for deeper issues such as skin laxity alongside texture.

A consultation with a qualified professional is the best way to determine which option aligns with your needs. Our team can advise on whether Dermapen microneedling, RF microneedling, or a combination of treatments is the most appropriate choice.

Myths and Misconceptions About Microneedling vs RF Microneedling

Myth 1: RF microneedling replaces microneedling entirely

It’s a common assumption that RF microneedling makes traditional microneedling unnecessary. In reality, both treatments still have a place, with microneedling often chosen for surface-level texture and tone and RF microneedling considered when deeper renewal is also required.

Myth 2: The results are exactly the same

Although both treatments encourage natural skin renewal, the addition of radiofrequency energy changes how RF microneedling works beneath the surface. This deeper action means the outcomes may not be identical, even though they share some overlapping benefits.

Myth 3: Only one treatment can be suitable

Some people assume they must choose between the two options, but that is not always the case. Depending on individual skin goals, microneedling and RF microneedling may be used at different stages or even as complementary parts of a broader plan.

Final Thoughts

When looking at RF microneedling vs microneedling, the main distinction lies in the use of radiofrequency energy. While both treatments encourage natural skin renewal through the creation of micro-channels, RF microneedling extends the process deeper by applying controlled heat beneath the surface.

Microneedling may be considered more suitable for surface-level concerns such as texture and tone, while RF microneedling offers an option for those also addressing firmness or mild laxity. Both approaches have a role in modern skin treatment, and the choice often depends on the depth of results being sought and individual skin goals.

How to book an appointment

To book an appointment, please call us on +61485 960 001, email us at admin@prophileclinics.com.au, or book online via our website.

FAQs

Is RF microneedling better than microneedling?

RF microneedling and microneedling work in different ways, so one is not necessarily “better” than the other. The choice depends on whether surface texture or deeper concerns like firmness are the focus.

Does RF microneedling hurt more than microneedling?

Both treatments involve creating micro-channels in the skin, which may cause a similar sensation. RF microneedling also produces warmth as radiofrequency energy is applied.

How many sessions of RF microneedling are needed compared to microneedling?

Both treatments usually require multiple sessions for the best results. Some people may notice changes sooner with RF microneedling, as it works at deeper levels, but this varies.

Can you have microneedling and RF microneedling together?

Yes, both treatments can sometimes be used as part of a broader skin treatment plan. A professional assessment is the best way to determine if they should be combined.

What is the cost difference between RF microneedling and microneedling in Australia?

RF microneedling is generally more expensive than traditional microneedling, as it involves additional technology. Exact pricing depends on the clinic and the treatment plan recommended.

Which concerns are best for RF microneedling vs microneedling?

Microneedling is often considered for surface-level texture and tone, while RF microneedling may also be chosen for mild skin laxity. The suitability depends on individual skin goals.